The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. We see no reason to disturb the jury's determinations concerning credibility. Defendant's accessorial liability was clearly established by evidence that shortly after the undercover officer addressed a request for drugs to defendant and his codefendant, defendant told the officer to wait, left with the codefendant, returned, and transferred a flashlight to the codefendant...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.