The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Defendant's guilt was established by expert testimony as to the scientific certainty of the fingerprint comparison, and by the absence of evidence of any reasonable innocent explanation for the presence of defendant's fingerprint on the complainant's property.
Defendant's speedy trial motion was properly denied. Defendant's various procedural challenges to the court...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
