Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
The motion court's summary denial of defendant's suppression motion was proper, because defendant's moving papers did not raise a factual dispute requiring a hearing. Defendant did not expressly deny participation in the drug sale upon which his arrest was predicated (see, People v Mendoza,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
