1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 234 Wis.2d
  5. 234 Wis.2d 98 (2000)
 

STATE v. KALK

No. 99-1164-CR.

234 Wis.2d 98 (2000)

2000 WI App 62

608 N.W.2d 428

STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. David KALK, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided February 23, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf of the defendant-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of John A. Pray of Frank J. Remington Center, University of Wisconsin Law School.

On behalf of the plaintiff-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of James E. Doyle, attorney general, and Michael R. Klos, assistant attorney general.

Before NETTESHEIM, Anderson and Snyder, JJ.

¶ 1. NETTESHEIM, J.

David Kalk argues that his criminal convictions should be reversed because of a conflict of interest on the part of the prosecuting attorney who had previously represented Kalk in an unrelated 1987 criminal proceeding. We reject Kalk's argument because he has failed to show any actual conflict of interest or prejudice. We affirm the judgment and order.

Facts

¶ 2. Robert...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases