1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 89 F.Supp.2d
  5. 89 F.Supp.2d 237 (2000)
 

CAPUTO v. PFIZER, INC.

No. 3:96CV2113 (WWE).

89 F.Supp.2d 237 (2000)

Anthony R. CAPUTO, David A. Cook, Paul B. Pebbles, and Duncan B. Robertson, Plaintiffs, v. PFIZER, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

March 23, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas G. Moukawsher, Moukawsher & Walsh, Groton, CT, for Plaintiffs.

Jonathan B. Orleans, S. Dave Vatti, Douglas John Varga, Zeldes, Needle & Cooper, Bridgeport, CT, for Defendant.

RULING ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

EGINTON, Senior District Judge.

In this action, the plaintiffs claim that Pfizer Inc. fraudulently induced them to retire and thereby deprived them of benefits under a Voluntary Separation Offer ("VSO") in violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA").

Pursuant to Rule 56, defendant Pfizer moves for summary judgment, asserting that the plaintiffs' claims are timed barred. Also pending...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases