1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 278 A.D.2d
  5. 278 A.D.2d 43 (2000)
 

PEOPLE v. DINKINS

278 A.D.2d 43 (2000)

717 N.Y.S.2d 167

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MICHAEL DINKINS, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided December 7, 2000.

The court properly exercised its discretion in limiting questioning of prospective jurors (see, People v Boulware, 29 N.Y.2d 135, cert denied 405 U.S. 995). Since the court itself adequately covered the jurors' obligation to draw no inference from the absence of testimony by a defendant, the court properly limited further inquiry on the same subject (compare, People v Wongshing, 245 A.D.2d 186

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases