Plaintiff's claim that defendants' 90-day notice was defective pursuant to CPLR 3216 (b) (3), because it was not sent by registered or certified mail, was not raised in the motion court, and, accordingly, is not preserved for our review. Were we to consider it, we would find that any noncompliance by defendants with the statutorily prescribed form of mailing was without prejudice to plaintiff, who received the notices. Defendants' nonconforming mailing amounted to no more...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
