1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 103 F.Supp.2d
  5. 103 F.Supp.2d 214 (2000)
 

EDWARDS v. AKZO NOBEL, INC.

No. 99-CV-6583L.

103 F.Supp.2d 214 (2000)

A. James EDWARDS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. AKZO NOBEL, INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. New York.

June 19, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Raymond M. Schlather, LoPinto, Schlather, Solomon & Salk, Ithaca, NY, for A. James Edwards, plaintiff.

Eugene D. Ulterino, Nixon, Peabody LLP, Rochester, NY, for Akzo Nobel, Inc., defendant.

DECISION AND ORDER

LARIMER, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs commenced this action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA"), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., seeking to recover certain retirement benefits allegedly due them under the Akzo Nobel Retirement Account Plan ("the Plan"). The original complaint contained six causes of action: two under ERISA; three state-law claims for breach...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases