IN THE MATTER OF MARRIAGE OF VAN WINKLE AND VAN WINKLE

(9400127D; CA A105248)

10 P.3d 306 (2000)

169 Or. App. 430

In the Matter of the MARRIAGE OF Christine A. VAN WINKLE, Respondent, and Richard L. VAN WINKLE, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 30, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard L. Van Winkle filed the briefs pro se.

Paul T. Beasley, The Dalles, filed the brief for respondent. With him on the brief was Van Valkenburgh, Hoffman & Beasley, PC.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG and KISTLER, Judges.


EDMONDS, P.J.

Husband appeals from a judgment dissolving the parties' marriage, contending that the trial court erred in several respects. One of husband's contentions is that the trial court erred in failing to rule on his pretrial discovery motion. Although we ordinarily conduct a de novo review of the record in dissolution matters under ORS 19.415(3), we reverse the judgment in this case and remand so that the discovery can occur.

The parties have...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases