The City's Fair Hearing Compliance Notice dated April 10, 1997 was not constitutionally inadequate as petitioner contends. The notice adequately apprised petitioner of the legal burden facing him at the hearing, to wit, that he had to prove that his needs were not being met with 24-hour "sleep-in" care and could only be met with the "split-shift" care he requested.
The petitioner appeared pro se at the administrative hearing, and the documentation he presented...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
