1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 204 F.3d
  5. 204 F.3d 109 (2000)
 

HEDGES v. MUSCO

No. 99-5111.

204 F.3d 109 (2000)

Dana HEDGES; George Hedges, on behalf of C.D. Minor, Appellants v. Ralph MUSCO, Individually and as Principal of Northern Highlands Regional High School; Greg McDonald; Cathy Kiely; Northern Highlands Regional High School Board of Education; Alan Geisenheimer, individually and as President and a member of the Northern Highlands Regional High School Board of Education; William Beisswanger, individually and as President and a member of the Northern Highlands Regional High School Board of Education; Mary Laurent; Barclay Blayman; Harold De Niear; Lynnette Krueger; Patricia Dubie; Linda Kempey; Nora Oliver; Tina Malizia; Neal Strohmeyer, individually and as members of the Northern Highlands Regional High School Board of Education; Urgent Care-Waldwick; Health Net Medical Group; Barbara Newman

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Filed February 22, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven M. Latimer (Argued), Loughlin & Latimer, Hackensack, NJ, for Appellants.

Robert T. Morgenstern (Argued), Dolan & Dolan, Newton, NJ, for Appellees Musco, McDonald, Kiely, Northern Highlands Regional High School Board of Education and all named members thereof.

Douglas J. Sherman (Argued), Louis A. Ruprecht, Ruprecht & Hart, Millburn, NJ, for Appellees Healthnet Medical Group and Barbara Newman.

Ronald K. Chen, Rutgers Constitutional Litigation Clinic, Newark, NJ, for Amicus Curiae American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey.

Before: ALITO and STAPLETON, Circuit Judges, and FEIKENS, District Judge.

OPINION OF THE COURT

STAPLETON, Circuit Judge:

Parents of a high school student commenced this action against a teacher, school officials, and members of the school board ("the NHRHS defendants"), alleging that, by requiring her to submit to a blood test and urinalysis, their child was subjected to an unconstitutional search and that, by disclosing the results of those tests, the defendants violated the child's right to privacy. In addition, plaintiffs argue...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases