1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 14 S.W.3d
  5. 14 S.W.3d 294 (2000)
 

HILL v. HYDE

No. WD 56651.

14 S.W.3d 294 (2000)

Marcellas HILL, et al., Respondent, v. Richard HYDE, et al., Appellants.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Decided March 28, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert R. Barton (Argued), Westwood, Michael L. Barrera, joins for Appellants Hyde, et al.

Aldo P. Caller (Argued), Kansas City, Robert P. Numrich, joins for Respondents Hill, et al.

Before JAMES M. SMART, Jr., P.J., JOSEPH M. ELLIS and EDWIN H. SMITH, JJ.

JAMES M. SMART, Jr., Judge.

Defendants Richard Hyde and Bowen Construction Company appeal the trial court ruling granting Plaintiff Hill a new trial on grounds of instructional error. The appellants contend that the instruction in question did not misstate the law and could not have caused any prejudice. They contend that the court erred in granting a new trial. Appellants also contend that the trial court erred in failing to grant the defendants a directed verdict...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases