U.S. EX REL. MERENA v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORP.

Nos. 98-1497, 98-1498, 98-1499.

205 F.3d 97 (2000)

UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Robert J. MERENA v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION United States of America, Appellant. United States of America ex rel. Kevin J. Spear; The Berkeley Community Law Center; Jack Dowden v. SmithKline Beecham Clinical Laboratories, Inc. United States of America, Appellant. United States of America ex rel. Glenn Grossenbacher; Charles W. Robinson, Jr. v. SmithKline Beecham Clinical Laboratories, Inc. United States of America, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Opinion Filed: February 29, 2000.

As Amended April 21, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Douglas N. Letter, Freddi Lipstein (argued), Joan E. Hartman, United States Department of Justice, Civil Division, Appellate Staff, Washington, D.C., for Appellant United States of America.

Marc S. Raspanti (argued), Miller, Alfano & Raspanti, Philadelphia, PA, for Appellee Robert J. Merena.

Thomas H. Lee, II, Dechert, Price & Rhoads, Philadelphia, PA, for Appellee Smithkline Beecham.

Normand F. Pizza, Nyda S. Brook, Christopher J. Shenfield, Brook, Pizza, & Van Loon, New Orleans, LA, for Appellee William, St. John & LaCorte.

John E. Clark, Goode, Casseb & Jones, San Antonio TX, for Appellees Charles W. Robinson, Jr., and Glenn Grossenbacher.

Peter W. Chatfield, Phillips & Cohen, Washington, DC, for Appellees Kevin J. Spear, Berkeley Community Law Center, and Jack Dowden.

Carol S. Dew, Dew & Smith, Monroe, GA, for Appellee Jeffrey Clausen.

Lisa R. Hovelson, Taxpayers Against Fraud, Washington D.C., for Amicus Curiae Taxpayers Against Fraud, The False Claims Act Legal Center.

Daniel Popeo, Paul D. Kamenar, Washington Legal Foundation, Washington, D.C., for Amicus Curiae Washington Legal Foundation.

Before: ALITO, McKEE, and GARWOOD, Circuit Judges


OPINION OF THE COURT

ALITO, Circuit Judge:

In this appeal, the United States challenges the District Court's decision to award a group of qui tam relators approximately $52 million of the government's settlement with defendant SmithKline Beecham Clinical Laboratories of a variety of claims under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq. For the reasons explained below, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

I.

A. In 1992...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases