1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 98 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 98 Cal.Rptr.2d 202 (2000)
 

CURE v. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA

No. E024244.

98 Cal.Rptr.2d 202 (2000)

82 Cal.App.4th 473

CUCAMONGANS UNITED FOR REASONABLE EXPANSION, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, Defendant and Respondent; Lauren Development, Inc., et al., Real Parties in Interest and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two.

Rehearing Denied August 10, 2000.

Review Denied October 18, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Office of Craig A. Sherman, Craig A. Sherman; Loeb & Loeb, Malissa Hathaway McKeith and Martha Sharp, Los Angeles, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

James L. Markman, City Attorney; Richards, Watson & Gershon and Steven H. Kaufmann, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Respondent.

Hewitt & McGuire, Mark R. McGuire and Andrew K. Hartzell, Irvine, for Real Parties in Interest and Respondents.

Certified for Partial Publication.*

OPINION

WARD, J.

Plaintiff and appellant Cucamongans United for Reasonable Expansion (CURE) appeal from a judgment denying its petition for writ of administrative mandamus brought under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.).1

CURE contends that the trial court erred because new information and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases