The court's finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. The evidence clearly established appellant's knowledge of, and intentional participation in, an attempted robbery where he entered a subway car with a group of juveniles who associated with each other for about 10 minutes, approached the complainant in unison, surrounded him, made threats and demands, went through the complainant's pockets, and dispersed together at...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
