The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the jury's determinations concerning credibility. The credible evidence clearly established defendant's active participation in the attempted grand larceny.
Defendant's remaining arguments are similar to arguments rejected by this Court on the codefendant's appeal (People v Zhao Shan,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.