Expert testimony concerning the use by drug dealers of hiding places and other means of separating themselves from drugs and buy money was properly admitted. This brief, limited testimony involved matters outside the knowledge of typical jurors, was warranted by the facts, and tended to explain why no physical evidence was recovered from defendant's person (see, People v Kelsey,
The challenged portions of...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
