1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 29 S.W.3d
  5. 29 S.W.3d 249 (2000)
 

HUIZAR v. STATE

No. 04-96-00837-CR.

29 S.W.3d 249 (2000)

Vincent HUIZAR, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio.

August 30, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard E. Langlois, Law Offices Of Richard E. Langlois, San Antonio, for Appellant.

Daniel Thornberry, Assistant Criminal District Attorney, San Antonio, Matthew W. Paul, State's Prosecuting Attorney, Betty Marshall, Assistant State Prosecuting Attorney, Austin, for Appellee.

Sitting en banc: PHIL HARDBERGER, Chief Justice, TOM RICKHOFF, Justice, ALMA L. LÓPEZ, Justice, CATHERINE STONE, Justice, PAUL W. GREEN, Justice, SARAH B. DUNCAN, Justice, KAREN ANGELINI, Justice.

OPINION

LÓPEZ, Justice.

Previously, we considered Vincent Huizar's appeal wherein he complained that his trial attorney was ineffective, in part, for failing to request a reasonable-doubt instruction during the punishment phase of trial. After examining the totality of the attorney's performance, we determined that the failure to ask for a reasonable-doubt instruction in the court's punishment charge did not amount to ineffective assistance of counsel...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases