1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 101 F.Supp.2d
  5. 101 F.Supp.2d 177 (2000)
 

KHREATIVITY UNLIMITED v. MATTEL, INC.

No. 99 CIV. 9321 SAS.

101 F.Supp.2d 177 (2000)

KHREATIVITY UNLIMITED, a Corporation, individually and on behalf of the Khreativity/Kidzart joint venture, Plaintiff, v. MATTEL, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

May 23, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Barry I. Fredericks, Howard M. Nashel, Joel M. Ellis, Jason R. Mischel, Nashel Kates Nussman Rapone Ellis & Traum, LLP, Hackensack, NJ, for Khreativity Unlimited, Inc.

Robin A. Henry, Anne E. Beaumont, Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP, Armonk, NY, John B. Quinn, Helen Heekyong Chae, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Mattel.

OPINION AND ORDER

SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.

Defendant Mattel, Inc. ("Mattel") moves for summary judgment on both claims filed against it by plaintiff Khreativity Unlimited, Inc. ("Khreativity"). In January 1998, Mattel entered into a licensing agreement with the National Basketball Association ("NBA") to produce a variety of NBA-related toys. Khreativity claims that the idea for this licensing agreement came

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases