B & B BROS. v. VATH


185 Misc.2d 90 (2000)

712 N.Y.S.2d 739

B & B BROTHERS, Respondent, v. MICHAEL VATH et al., Appellants.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department.

May 30, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael Vath and another, appellants pro se.

DiPAOLA, P. J., FLOYD and PALELLA, JJ., concur.


OPINION OF THE COURT

MEMORANDUM.

Judgment unanimously reversed without costs and complaint dismissed.

CPLR 3015 (e) appears to allow businesses which do not possess a valid business license prior to the performance of work, as mandated by local statute in certain specified counties, to cure that deficiency nunc pro tunc through subsequent procurement of a license after an action is commenced and on amendment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases