RICHARDSON v. NAVISTAR INTERN. TRANSP.

No. 990253.

8 P.3d 263 (2000)

2000 UT 65

Christian Dan RICHARDSON and Jessica Richardson, By and Through their father and general guardian, Dan L. RICHARDSON, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. NAVISTAR INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION, a corporation; and Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc., a corporation, Defendants and Appellees.

Supreme Court of Utah.

August 15, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter C. Collins, Kevin J. Kurumada, Salt Lake City, for plaintiffs.

Glenn C. Hanni, Kristin A. VanOrman, Dawn M. Call, H. James Clegg, Judith D. Wolferts, Salt Lake City, for defendants.


DURHAM, Justice:

¶ 1 Pursuant to rule 41 of the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit certified the following question to us for decision:

Under Utah law, may plaintiffs who have entered into a judicially approved settlement with multiple defendants after a trial in which a jury allocated 100% of fault among the parties pursuant to the Utah comparative fault scheme, Utah Code Ann. §§ 78...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases