1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 88 Ohio
  5. 88 Ohio St.3d 161 (2000)
 

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. PAPCKE

No. 99-1888.

88 Ohio St.3d 161 (2000)

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. PAPCKE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided February 23, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jonathan E. Coughlan, Disciplinary Counsel, and Kevin L. Williams, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.

Kegler, Brown, Hill & Ritter and Geoffrey Stern, for respondent.

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the board. "`[W]hen an attorney engages in a course of conduct resulting in a finding that the attorney has violated DR 1-102(A)(4), the attorney will be actually suspended from the practice of law for an appropriate period of time.'" Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Knowlton (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 76, 78, 689 N.E.2d 538, 539, quoting

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases