ATTY GEN OF CANADA v. RJ REYNOLDS TOBACCO HOLDINGS, INC.

No. 99-CV-2194.

103 F.Supp.2d 134 (2000)

The ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA, Plaintiff, v. RJ REYNOLDS TOBACCO HOLDINGS, INC., RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company, RJ Reynolds Tobacco International, Inc., RJR-Macdonald, Inc., RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company Pr, Northern Brands International, Inc., and Canadian Tobacco Manufacturers Council, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. New York.

June 30, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hiscock, Barclay Law Firm, Syracuse, NY, Robert A. Barrer, of counsel, Bartlit, Beck Law Firm, Denver, CO, Fred H. Bartlit, Jr., Karma M. Giulianelli, of counsel, Bartlit, Beck Law Firm, Chicago, IL, Jason L. Peltz, of counsel, Notre Dame Law Firm, Notre Dame, IN, G. Robert Blakey, of counsel, for plaintiff.

Jones, Day, Reavis Firm, Washington, DC, Michael Peter Gurdak, Timothy John Finn, of counsel, for defendants RJ Reynolds Tobacco Holdings, Inc. and RJ Reynolds Tobacco Co.

Scolaro, Shulman, Cohen, Lawler & Burstein, P.C., Syracuse, NY, Alan S. Burstein, of counsel, for defendants RJ Reynolds Tobacco Holdings, Inc., and RJ Reynolds Tobacco Co.

Sullivan & Heard Law Firm, New York City, C. Stephen Heard, for defendants RJ Reynolds Tobacco International, Inc., RJR-MacDonald, Inc., RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company PR, and Northern Brands International, Inc.

King & Spalding Law Firm, Washington, DC, William C. Hendricks, III, of counsel, for defendant Canadian Tobacco Manufacturers Council.

King & Spalding Law Firm, New York City, Patricia A. Griffin, for defendant Canadian Tobacco Manufacturers Council.

King & Spalding, Atlanta, GA, Richard A. Schneider, of counsel, for defendant Canadian Tobacco Manufacturers Council.


MEMORANDUM — DECISION & ORDER

McAVOY, District Judge.

The Attorney General of Canada ("Canada") commenced the instant action against Defendants alleging violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act ("RICO"), 18 U.S.C. § 1961, et. seq. arising out of an alleged smuggling scheme designed to avoid the payment of Canadian taxes. Presently before the Court are separate motions by all of the Defendants to dismiss...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases