In his memorandum responding to relator's motion to show cause why he should not be held in contempt, respondent argues that no formal complaint has ever been filed against him with the board, that he is unable to produce some documents requested in the subpoena because they do not exist, that he has not held himself out as an attorney at law, and that activities in which he engages do not constitute the practice of law.
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
