1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 11 P.3d
  5. 11 P.3d 211 (2000)
 

STATE v. VAUGHN

No. 90,999.

11 P.3d 211 (2000)

2000 OK 63

STATE of Oklahoma, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Danny Eugene VAUGHN and Charles Smith, Defendants/Appellants.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

Rehearing Denied September 12, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry Scoufos, Thomas W. Condit, Sallisaw, Oklahoma, for appellants.

Charles L. Richardson, Tulsa County District Attorney, Fred J. Morgan, Assistant District Attorney, Tulsa, Oklahoma, for appellee.

BOUDREAU, Justice:

¶ 1 Two questions are presented on certiorari. First, did the trial court commit legal error when it determined that the State's filing of an amended information did not discharge the Bondsman's obligation on the bail bond? Second, did the trial court abuse its discretion in refusing to vacate its forfeiture order under 59 O.S. Supp.1995, 1332(C)(5)(b)? Because the trial court did not commit legal error...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases