STATE v. DEDONADO

No. 43956-1-I.

991 P.2d 1216 (2000)

99 Wash.App. 251

STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Kim L. DEDONADO, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

January 31, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dawn Monroe and Eric Broman, of Neilsen, Broman & Associates, P.L.L.C., Seattle, for Appellant.

Sharon Ann Dear, Kennewick, for Respondent.


PER CURIAM.

When a criminal restitution hearing is held, the State must establish a causal connection between the crime and the victim's claimed damages. The trial court ordered restitution in this case without requiring the State to prove that connection because the defendant did not object to the State's restitution evidence before the restitution hearing was held. Because a defendant is not required to object to the State's restitution evidence before the restitution...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases