1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 123 F.Supp.2d
  5. 123 F.Supp.2d 91 (2000)
 

ADLER v. KENT VILLAGE HOUSING CO., INC.

No. 99-CV-1035(FB).

123 F.Supp.2d 91 (2000)

Moshe ADLER, Reizel Adler, David Goldberger, Rachel Goldberger, Shaindi Goldberger, Zvi Goldberger, Aron Ehrenfeld, Rachel Ehrenfeld, Chaya Einhorn, Chaim Einhorn, Menachem Feuerstein, Goldie Feuerstein, Nathan Fisch, Rachel Fisch, Solomon Miller, Esther Miller, Rose Goldberger-Stuhl, Moses Stuhl, David Schenker, Rachel Schenker, Judy Noe-Grunwald, Mattis Hollander, Chana Hollander, Chaya Berkowitz-Stern, Mendel Stern, Leopold Strulovitch, Blimie Strulovitch, Eliezer Zafir, Frady Zafir, Chaim Zorger and Bella Zorger, Plaintiffs, v. KENT VILLAGE HOUSING COMPANY, INC., a/k/a Roberto Clemente Plaza, Robert E. Paul, the City of New York Department of Housing Preservation and Development, Richard T. Roberts, individually and as Commissioner of the City of New York Department of Housing Preservation and Development, Robin Weinstein, individually and as an Assistant Commissioner of the City of New York Department of Housing Preservation and Development, and Julie C. Walpert individually and as Assistant Commissioner of the City of New York Department of Housing Preservation and Development, Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. New York.

November 21, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David J. Berger, Tenenbaum Dunbar Saltiel & Berger LLP, Brooklyn, NY, for Plaintiffs.

Kent Village Housing Company, Inc., a/k/a, and Robert E. Paul: Joseph Delman, Whitehorn & Delman, New York City, City of New York Department of Housing, Preservation and Development, Richard T. Roberts, Robin Weinstein and Julie C. Walpert, Michael D. Hess, Corporation Counsel of the City of New York, by Lawrence S. Kahn, Debra A. Hochman, Assistant Corporation Counsel, New York City, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BLOCK, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, thirty-one occupants of fifteen apartments at Robert Clemente Plaza ("Clemente Plaza"), brought suit advancing in their complaint eleven claims for violations of federal, state and municipal law alleging on various theories that defendants seek to wrongfully abrogate plaintiffs' leases, and have targeted them for eviction because they are Jewish. Specifically, the First, Second, Third and Fourth...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases