1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 996 P.2d
  5. 996 P.2d 1087 (2000)
 

STEWART v. BRB

No. 42041-1-I.

996 P.2d 1087 (2000)

100 Wash.App. 165

Dr. J. Arthur STEWART and Ardella Stewart, husband and wife, Appellants, v. WASHINGTON STATE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD FOR KING COUNTY, King County, City of Auburn, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

Publication Ordered March 21, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert E. West Jr., West & Collins PS, Auburn, WA, Elaine L. Spencer, Graham & Dunn, Seattle, WA, for Appellants.

Michael J. Reynolds, Auburn, WA, for Defendants.

Robert C. Kaufman, Herman, Recor, Kaufman & Simmerly, Bellevue, WA, H.K. Wright, Peter G. Ramels, King Co. Courthouse, Seattle, WA, for Respondents.

ELLINGTON, J.

The Washington State Boundary Review Board (BRB) is not the appropriate forum for a challenge to a county's comprehensive plan. King County's Comprehensive Plan designates Stewarts' property for agricultural use. Stewarts first objected to this designation in a BRB proceeding in 1997, when the BRB considered a petition from the City of Auburn to annex the land. The BRB found the petition premature in the absence of an interlocal agreement to preserve...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases