PER CURIAM.
The Defendant appeals his jury conviction and sentence for strong-armed robbery. He argues that a prosecutor's remark and the admission of collateral crimes evidence warrant a new trial. We find no merit in these issues.
He also contends that the trial court erred in sentencing him as a habitual felony offender, a habitual violent felony offender, and a prison releasee reoffender. The State contends this argument is not preserved because the Defendant...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
