1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 763 A.2d
  5. 763 A.2d 1272 (2000)
 

MUIRFIELD CONST. CO. v. ESSEX CTY. IMPROVEMENT AUTH.

763 A.2d 1272 (2000)

MUIRFIELD CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ESSEX COUNTY IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY and Thomas H. Barham Co., Inc., Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 27, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert Hedinger, Florham Park, argued the cause for appellant (Hedinger & Lawless, attorneys; Mr. Hedinger, on the brief).

William E. Frese, Newark, argued the cause for respondent Thomas H. Barham Co., Inc. (Mr. Frese, attorney; John F. Doherty, on the brief).

Thomas P. Scrivo, Morristown, argued the cause for respondent Essex County Improvement Authority (McElroy, Deutsch & Mulvaney, attorneys; Mr. Scrivo, on the brief).

Before Judges BAIME, CARCHMAN and LINTNER.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by CARCHMAN, J.A.D.

In this public contract bidding dispute, plaintiff Muirfield Construction Co., Inc., a plumbing contractor, appeals from the denial of its protest of defendant Essex County Improvement Authority's (ECIA) award of a contract for plumbing and fire protection work at the Support Building for the County Correctional Facility to defendant, Thomas H. Barham Co., Inc. (Barham). Barham submitted a bid including a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases