1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 761 A.2d
  5. 761 A.2d 1258 (2000)
 

SEAMON v. W.C.A.B. (SARNO & SON FORMALS)

761 A.2d 1258 (2000)

Peter Robert SEAMON, Petitioner, v. WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (SARNO & SON FORMALS), Respondent.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided November 9, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter Robert Seaman, petitioner, pro se.

Robert T. Panowicz and Jerome G. Dunham, Wilkes-Barre, for respondent.

Before DOYLE, President Judge, COLINS, Judge, SMITH, Judge PELLEGRINI, Judge, FRIEDMAN, Judge, FLAHERTY, Judge, LEADBETTER, Judge.

LEADBETTER, Judge.1

This case raises a question of first impression regarding the utilization review (UR) provisions of the Workers' Compensation Act (Act).2 On April 30, 1999, this court granted reargument before the court en banc to consider whether the failure of a utilization review organization (URO) to obtain medical records from all other treating providers, as required by applicable regulations...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases