1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 761 So.2d
  5. 761 So.2d 1242 (2000)
 

S.D. v. C.A.T.

No. 2D99-1543.

761 So.2d 1242 (2000)

S.D., Appellant, v. C.A.T., Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 12, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Karol K. Williams and Allison M. Perry, Tampa (withdrew after briefing); Edward J. Page and Robert E. Biasotti of Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel, Smith & Cutler, P.A., St. Petersburg (substituted as counsel of record), for Appellant.

Sharon L. Tavares and Raymond A. Tavares, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this paternity action, S.D. challenges the trial court's order granting summary judgment in favor of the mother, C.A.T. In his brief, S.D. argued that summary judgment was improper because disputed issues of material fact existed concerning whether he was, in fact, the biological father of the child. We now have the results of DNA testing, which establish that the probability that S.D. is the biological father of the child is 99.9999 percent.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases