1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 996 P.2d
  5. 996 P.2d 1001 (2000)
 

SANDGATHE v. JAGGER

(169813930; CA A105822)

996 P.2d 1001 (2000)

165 Or. App. 375

Joseph David SANDGATHE, Appellant, v. James C. JAGGER, Respondent, and Jane Doe and John Doe 1-50, Defendants.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 9, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph David Sandgathe filed the brief pro se for appellant.

Joel S. DeVore and Luvaas, Cobb, Richards & Fraser, P.C., Eugene, filed the brief for respondent.

Before De MUNIZ, Presiding Judge, and HASELTON and WOLLHEIM, Judges.

HASELTON, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing with prejudice his legal malpractice action against his former criminal defense attorney. He contends that, under the reasoning of Stevens v. Bispham, 316 Or. 221, 851 P.2d 556 (1993), the court erred in dismissing the action with prejudice rather than without prejudice. We reverse.

Plaintiff's malpractice action arises out of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases