1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 996 P.2d
  5. 996 P.2d 963 (2000)
 

REDLER v. REDLER

(CC 88-1199-D-3; CA A95930; SC S45804)

996 P.2d 963 (2000)

330 Or. 51

Patricia G. REDLER, Petitioner, and Lawrence H. REDLER, Respondent, State of Oregon, Department of Human Resources, Petitioner-Respondent, Respondent on Review, v. Lawrence H. Redler, Respondent-Appellant, Petitioner on Review, and Patricia G. Redler, Obligee.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided March 3, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lawrence H. Redler, petitioner on review pro se, argued the cause and filed the brief.

Jas. Jeffrey Adams, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent on review. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.

Before CARSON, Chief Justice, and GILLETTE, VAN HOOMISSEN, DURHAM, and LEESON, Justices.

LEESON, J.

The issue in this case is whether the Court of Appeals erred in affirming a judgment of the trial court that increased the child support obligation of petitioner (father). Redler and Redler, 153 Or.App. 135, 956 P.2d 232 (1998). We limit our review to questions of law, ORS 19.415(4), and affirm the Court of Appeals.

Father and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases