BAYWAY REFINING v. STATE UTIL.


755 A.2d 1204 (2000)

333 N.J. Super. 420

BAYWAY REFINING COMPANY and Tosco Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. STATE UTILITIES, INC., Raymond M. Young and Lucy Young Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 25, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Patrick M. Flynn and Thomas A. Muccifori, Haddonfield, argued the cause for appellants (Archer & Greiner attorneys, Mr. Flynn, on the brief).

Philip Elberg, Newark, argued the cause for respondents (Medvin & Elberg, attorneys, Mr. Elberg on the brief).

Before Judges BAIME, EICHEN and WECKER.


The opinion of the court was delivered by WECKER, J.A.D.

Plaintiffs, Bayway Refining Company and Tosco Corporation, appeal the dismissal of their complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction. The motion court found that defendants, State Utilities, Inc. and Raymond and Lucy Young, lacked the required minimum contacts with New Jersey to support jurisdiction. We agree and therefore...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases