STATE v. PIETRZAK

No. 18402-1-III.

997 P.2d 947 (2000)

100 Wash.App. 291

STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Stanley Leonard PIETRZAK, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Nine.

April 13, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lorraine A. Parlange, Spokane, for Appellant.

Kevin M. Korsmo, Andrew J. Metts, Deputy Pros. Attys, Spokane, for Respondent.


SWEENEY, J.

RCW 9.68A.090 prohibits communication with a minor for immoral purposes. Stanley Pietrzak communicated with his 16-year-old niece for the purpose of photographing her nude body. The question before the court is whether the language of RCW 9.68A.090 is so vague as to be unenforceable. We conclude that the words "communicate" and "immoral purposes" are well defined and easily understood, and therefore reject his challenge to this statutory scheme. We therefore...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases