1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 752 A.2d
  5. 752 A.2d 1189 (2000)
 

COLE v. CHANDLER

752 A.2d 1189 (2000)

2000 ME 104

Curtis COLE v. Brenda CHANDLER. Curtis Cole v. Pola Buckley and the Mead Corporation.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.

Decided May 26, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas S. Carey (orally), Joseph R. Saunders, Carey & Assoc., Rumford, for plaintiff.

Peter J. DeTroy (orally), Russell B. Pierce Jr., Norman, Hanson & DeTroy, LLC, Portland, for Pola Buckley.

John S. Whitman (orally), Richardson, Whitman, Large & Badger, P.C., Portland, for Brenda Chandler.

James R. Erwin (orally), Nathan V. Gemmiti, Pierce Atwood, Portland, for Mead Corp.

Before WATHEN, C.J., and CLIFFORD, RUDMAN, DANA, SAUFLEY, ALEXANDER, and CALKINS, JJ.

WATHEN, C.J.

[¶ 1] Plaintiff, Curtis Cole, appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Oxford County, Warren, J.) granting defendants Brenda Chandler's and Pola Buckley's motions for summary judgment in Cole's actions for defamation, invasion of privacy, interference with advantageous economic relations, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and punitive damages. Cole also appeals from a judgment entered in the court (Perkins, J....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases