1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 997 P.2d
  5. 997 P.2d 915 (2000)
 

SUNDQUIST HOMES, INC. v. PUD

No. 67715-8.

997 P.2d 915 (2000)

140 Wash.2d 403

SUNDQUIST HOMES, INC., a Washington corporation; Echelbarger Development, Inc., a Washington corporation; Simmie Energy, Inc., a Delaware corporation; Phoenix Development, a Washington corporation; Alfred Mus; and Donald Saunders, Petitioners, v. SNOHOMISH COUNTY PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1, a Washington municipality, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Decided April 27, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert C. Rowley, Kirkland, James J. Klauser, Seattle, for Petitioner.

James Deno, Everett, for Respondent.

Stephen Overstreet, Olympia, for Amicus Curiae on Behalf of Building Industry Association of Washington.

Richard Stephens, Bellevue, for Amicus Curiae on Behalf of Washington Association of Realtors.

ALEXANDER, J.

The principal issue before us is whether a public utility district may charge a real estate developer for costs the district incurs in relocating electrical transmission facilities, when the relocation is a necessary condition of the developer's project. We answer that question in the affirmative and, thus, affirm the Court of Appeals.

Sundquist Homes, Inc.1 purchases large tracts of undeveloped land in Snohomish...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases