1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 760 So.2d
  5. 760 So.2d 1110 (2000)
 

AIU INS. CO. v. DAIDONE

No. 4D99-3115.

760 So.2d 1110 (2000)

AIU INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Charles DAIDONE, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 5, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hinda Klein of Conroy, Simberg & Ganon, P.A., Hollywood, for appellant.

Allen R. Seaman of Stafford & Seaman, P.A., Lake Worth, for appellee.

KLEIN, J.

This is an appeal from county court in which the court certified the following question as one of great public importance:

DOES A PIP INSURANCE CARRIER LOSE ITS RIGHT TO CONTEST THE NECESSITY OF CARE OR THE REASONABLENESS OF THE BILL RENDERED FOR THAT CARE, WHERE THE CARRIER FAILS TO OBTAIN A WRITTEN REPORT STATING THAT SUCH CARE IS UNNECESSARY OR THE BILL IS UNREASONABLE WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE CARRIER'S RECEIPT OF THE BILL IN QUESTION?

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases