1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 732 N.E.2d
  5. 732 N.E.2d 1129 (2000)
 

TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION CENTER, INC. v. AMT

No. 1-99-0364.

732 N.E.2d 1129 (2000)

315 Ill. App.3d 238

247 Ill.Dec. 797

TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION CENTER, INC., an Illinois Corporation d/b/a Evanston Business and Technology Center, Plaintiff-Appellee (James T. Murray, individually, Respondent-Appellee), v. ADVANCED MULTIUSER TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, an Illinois Corporation; Carole J. Pickelsimer, individually; and Douglas R. Cannon, individually, Defendants-Appellants.

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Third Division.

June 30, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Douglas R. Cannon, Skokie, for appellants.

Elliot R. Schiff, Schiff, Gorman & Krkljes, Chicago, for respondent-appellee.

Brand & Novak, Ltd., Chicago, for plaintiff-appellee.

Justice WOLFSON delivered the opinion of the court:

This started out as a forcible entry and detainer case. It turned into a rancorous Supreme Court Rule 137 sanctions proceeding that took on a life of its own. All in all, it has bounced around in our judicial system for more than seven years. Hopefully, with this opinion, we now put an end to it.

Advanced Multiuser Technologies (AMT), Carole Pickelsimer (Pickelsimer), and Douglas Cannon (Cannon) (collectively...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases