1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 781 So.2d
  5. 781 So.2d 1063 (2000)
 

FUSTER-ESCALONA v. WISOTSKY

No. SC93949.

781 So.2d 1063 (2000)

Francisco FUSTER-ESCALONA, Petitioner, v. Steven J. WISOTSKY, et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Rehearing Denied March 21, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Francisco Fuster-Escalona, Petitioner, Indiantown, Florida, pro se.

Steven Wisotsky, Coconut Grove, Florida, pro se.

William J. Berger, Boca Raton, Florida; and Heidi F. Friedman of Panza, Maurer, Maynard & Neel, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, Florida, for Respondents.

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Fuster-Escalona v. Wisotsky, 715 So.2d 1053 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), which expressly and directly conflicts with the decision in Lukowsky v. Hauser & Metsch, P.A., 677 So.2d 1383 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. The conflict issue is whether a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases