1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 748 So.2d
  5. 748 So.2d 1089 (2000)
 

FINISH LINE FEED, INC. v. ACOSTA

No. 99-1691.

748 So.2d 1089 (2000)

FINISH LINE FEED, INC., Appellant, v. Cedrick A. ACOSTA and Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

January 5, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Martin E. Feldman of Fischer & Minski, P.A., Hollywood, for appellant.

Judy L. Harrelson, Tallahassee, for Appellee-Unemployment Appeals Commission.

PER CURIAM.

In this unemployment compensation case the claimant was discharged because, contrary to the employer's Employment Manual, he neither reported for work as scheduled nor notified the employer that he would be absent. The appeals referee concluded that "one incident of no call, no show does not rise to the level of misconduct as defined in the unemployment compensation law." The appeals referee's order was affirmed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases