GOODALL v. U.S.

No. 99-CO-1063.

759 A.2d 1077 (2000)

Carlos GOODALL, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided September 28, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas T. Heslep, Alexandria, VA, appointed by the court, for appellant.

Ayanna J. McKay, Assistant United States Attorney, with whom Wilma A. Lewis, United States Attorney, and John R. Fisher, Thomas J. Tourish, Jr. and David L. Smith, Assistant United States Attorneys, were on the brief, for appellee.

Before WAGNER, Chief Judge, and STEADMAN and FARRELL, Associate Judges.


PER CURIAM.

Goodall contends that the trial court abused its discretion by denying his post-sentence motion to withdraw his guilty plea without a hearing. Primarily, he asserts that in pleading guilty to manslaughter while armed,1 he was misinformed by his attorney that he would be eligible for parole once he served the five year minimum term mandated by the "while armed" statute, without regard to the actual minimum sentence imposed by...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases