1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 762 A.2d
  5. 762 A.2d 1057 (2000)
 

GREAT ATL. & PAC. TEA CO. v. CHECCHIO

762 A.2d 1057 (2000)

335 N.J. Super. 495

The GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Amerigo CHECCHIO and Romano Checchio, Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 14, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Francis B. Sheehan, Montvale, argued the cause for appellant (Beattie Padovano, attorneys; Mr. Sheehan, of counsel and on the brief).

Vincent K. Loughlin, Westfield, argued the cause for respondents (Johnstone, Skok, Loughlin & Lane, attorneys; Mr. Loughlin, on the brief).

Before Judges KESTIN, CIANCIA and ALLEY.

The opinion of the court was delivered by CIANCIA, J.A.D.

This is a dispute concerning the interpretation of a commercial lease. Specifically, the question is whether the landlord or tenant is contractually obligated to pay for the repair of roof trusses and heating equipment. The tenant is appellant, The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company (A&P), and the landlord/owners are respondents Amerigo Checchio and Romano Checchio (Checchios). The disputed issues...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases