1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 762 A.2d
  5. 762 A.2d 1040 (2000)
 

COX v. COX

762 A.2d 1040 (2000)

335 N.J. Super. 465

Margaret M. COX, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Harry E. COX, Defendant-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 12, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rabkin Law Offices, attorneys for appellant (Maryann J. Rabkin, on the brief).

Zane & Lozuke, Woodbury, attorneys for respondent (Arlene A. Gerber, on the brief).

Before Judges BAIME, CARCHMAN and LINTNER.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by CARCHMAN, J.A.D.

This appeal requires us to examine the scope and application of the recent amendment to N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23 providing for limited duration alimony. We conclude that the award of limited duration alimony to a spouse following a twenty-two year marriage was inappropriate and inconsistent with the statutory criteria for such an award and that permanent alimony...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases