ANDREWS v. EMPLOYMENT DEPT.

(98-AB-1938; CA A103761).

998 P.2d 769 (2000)

166 Or. App. 401

James P. ANDREWS, Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT and Jeld-Wen, a corporation, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided April 5, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lee S. Werdell, Medford, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Werdell & Hanson.

Kirk S. Peterson, Portland, argued the causefor respondent Jeld-Wen, Inc. With him on the brief were David J. Riewald and Bullard, Korshoj, Smith & Jernstedt.

Mary H. Williams, Assistant Solicitor General, waived appearance for respondent Employment Department.

Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and LINDER and BREWER, Judges.


BREWER, J.

Claimant seeks review of a final order of the Employment Appeals Board (EAB) denying his claim for unemployment compensation benefits. Claimant argues that EAB erred, as a matter of law, in concluding that he was discharged pursuant to a reasonable drug testing policy adopted by employer and, further, in concluding that claimant's refusal to take a drug test on his own time, without compensation, constituted an act disqualifying him from eligibility for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases