1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 750 A.2d
  5. 750 A.2d 993 (2000)
 

LAFLAMME v. ESSEX JUNCTION SCHOOL DIST.

No. 97-493.

750 A.2d 993 (2000)

Stanley LaFLAMME v. ESSEX JUNCTION SCHOOL DISTRICT and Essex Junction Prudential Committee.

Supreme Court of Vermont.

Motion for Reargument Denied May 2, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edwin L. Hobson, Burlington, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Douglas C. Pierson and Thomas M. Higgins of Pierson, Wadhams, Quinn & Yates, Burlington, for Defendants-Appellants.

Present AMESTOY, C.J., DOOLEY, MORSE and SKOGLUND, JJ., and ALLEN, C.J.(Ret.), Specially Assigned.

MORSE, J.

Defendants Essex Junction School District and Essex Junction Prudential Committee (school board) appeal a jury verdict awarding plaintiff Stanley LaFlamme damages for violation of his right to procedural due process under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Because the evidence was insufficient to support such a claim as a matter of law, we reverse.

This controversy arose when the Essex Junction Prudential Committee, which functions as the school board for the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases