PULICH v. DAME

No. 23733-4-II.

991 P.2d 712 (2000)

Celine PULICH and David Pulich, wife and husband, Appellants, v. Roland DAME and "Jane Doe" Dame, husband and wife and the marital community composed thereof, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

January 21, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Timothy L. Healy, Benjamin Pollock Healy, Lakewood, Charles E. Robbins, Sumner, for Appellants.

Mark J. Dynan, Tacoma, Marilee C. Erickson, William Robert Hickman, Reed McClure, Seattle, for Respondents.


SEINFELD, J.

In yet another case involving the interplay between several mandatory arbitration rules, we conclude that a motion for a trial de novo filed before the arbitrator files proof of service of the award is premature but not untimely and that a party who moves for entry of the arbitrator's award waives a challenge to the arbitrator's failure to file proof of service. Thus, here, the plaintiff who prevailed before the arbitrator but lost at trial cannot challenge...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases