Presiding Justice CAHILL delivered the opinion of the court:
Defendant appeals a substantial jury verdict for plaintiff. Plaintiff cross-appeals. We reverse and remand for a new trial because the jury received a nonpattern jury instruction on willful and wanton negligence that misstated the law in Illinois.
To resolve the principal issue in this case we must examine language contained in a nonpattern jury instruction tendered
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.