1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 90 Ohio
  5. 90 Ohio St.3d 77 (2000)
 

STATE EX REL. REESE v. LISOTTO

No. 00-893.

90 Ohio St.3d 77 (2000)

THE STATE EX REL. REESE, APPELLANT, v. LISOTTO, JUDGE, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided September 20, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph Reese, Jr., pro se.

Paul J. Gains, Mahoning County Prosecuting Attorney, and Janice T. O'Halloran, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for respondent.

Per Curiam.

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. Judge Lisotto had no duty to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law on Reese's second and third petitions for postconviction relief. State ex rel. Fuller v. Sutula (1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 301, 302, 714 N.E.2d 924, 924-925. And Judge Lisotto's 1997 judgment entry denying Reese postconviction relief satisfied the requirement for findings...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases